rekonq, working on extension support

Because a video sometimes is better than words…

This tiny video shows the actual state of extension support:
– we can manage chrome extensions (I just copied examples from here): we can recognize unpacked extensions, install, enable/disable. (oops.. uninstall/delete missing. Adding next days..)
– we can interpret (a bit) the version 2 manifest.json inside
– we can manage browse actions
– we can manage page actions
– we can open popups

So, the first easy step is done. Now what to really say we are supporting chrome extensions? Here is my todo list:
– support chrome object and (a subset of) its API (very long task)
– support the callback mechanism (really hard, this is the trick missing to say we’ll reach one day our goal)
– implement a way to retrieve extensions (support chrome extensions site? seems problematic. Add a ghns layer? Should do the trick. Probably…)
– ehm… port/implement extensions 😉

Stay tuned.

21 responses to “rekonq, working on extension support

  1. Way to go, dude! You’re doing an amazing job. I’m really looking forward to it. I just hope this doesn’t make rekonq heavier, since 2.0 it feels heavy.

  2. Many many thanks!

  3. I can’t wait for testing it.

  4. Pingback: ReKonq Gaining Chrome Extension Support, Still Sponsored By Blue Systems

  5. Pingback: Rekonq ze wsparciem rozszerzeń Chrome | KDEFamily

  6. Pingback: Links 22/5/2013: Debian GNU/Hurd, New Go Language Release | Techrights

  7. Pingback: <° Linux | Rekonq tendrá soporte para las extensiones de Google Chrome

  8. Pingback: openSUSE et open source » Blog Archive » KDE 4.11, la stabilité avant l’évolution et Rekonq promet du lourd

  9. This is great.
    I’d like to use the Chrome Web Store, I think it would be the easiest way to find and download (almost) all the extensions available.

  10. Pingback: Rekonq: in arrivo il supporto per le estensioni di Google Chrome : NetItaly .info

  11. Pingback: PING: Android, Okular, Pidora, rekonq, Dianara, Jolla, Tizen, Ubuntu...

  12. Pingback: El soporte de extensiones en Rekonq va cobrando forma

  13. Pingback: ReKonq: supporto per gli addon di Chrome in arrivo | oneOpenSource

  14. It’s sad if we need to use Chrome Web Store. Very very sad. I think Rekonq extensions need to be independant from Google (but if the Chrome to Rekonq transition is easy that’s great). Using Google services must be an option, not a requirement.

    Another question by the way: why don’t you make Rekonq compatible with Firefox extensions? Is it about technical details? Will it be possible to support Firefox extensions in the future?

    And goob job, indeed.

  15. Pingback: Rokonq … sempre meglio. | Linarch Blog.

Leave a comment