Because a video sometimes is better than words…
This tiny video shows the actual state of extension support:
– we can manage chrome extensions (I just copied examples from here): we can recognize unpacked extensions, install, enable/disable. (oops.. uninstall/delete missing. Adding next days..)
– we can interpret (a bit) the version 2 manifest.json inside
– we can manage browse actions
– we can manage page actions
– we can open popups
So, the first easy step is done. Now what to really say we are supporting chrome extensions? Here is my todo list:
– support chrome object and (a subset of) its API (very long task)
– support the callback mechanism (really hard, this is the trick missing to say we’ll reach one day our goal)
– implement a way to retrieve extensions (support chrome extensions site? seems problematic. Add a ghns layer? Should do the trick. Probably…)
– ehm… port/implement extensions 😉
Stay tuned.
Way to go, dude! You’re doing an amazing job. I’m really looking forward to it. I just hope this doesn’t make rekonq heavier, since 2.0 it feels heavy.
Many many thanks!
I can’t wait for testing it.
Pingback: ReKonq Gaining Chrome Extension Support, Still Sponsored By Blue Systems
Pingback: Rekonq ze wsparciem rozszerzeń Chrome | KDEFamily
Pingback: Links 22/5/2013: Debian GNU/Hurd, New Go Language Release | Techrights
Pingback: <° Linux | Rekonq tendrá soporte para las extensiones de Google Chrome
Pingback: openSUSE et open source » Blog Archive » KDE 4.11, la stabilité avant l’évolution et Rekonq promet du lourd
This is great.
I’d like to use the Chrome Web Store, I think it would be the easiest way to find and download (almost) all the extensions available.
Pingback: Rekonq: in arrivo il supporto per le estensioni di Google Chrome : NetItaly .info
Pingback: PING: Android, Okular, Pidora, rekonq, Dianara, Jolla, Tizen, Ubuntu...
Pingback: El soporte de extensiones en Rekonq va cobrando forma
Pingback: ReKonq: supporto per gli addon di Chrome in arrivo | oneOpenSource
It’s sad if we need to use Chrome Web Store. Very very sad. I think Rekonq extensions need to be independant from Google (but if the Chrome to Rekonq transition is easy that’s great). Using Google services must be an option, not a requirement.
Another question by the way: why don’t you make Rekonq compatible with Firefox extensions? Is it about technical details? Will it be possible to support Firefox extensions in the future?
And goob job, indeed.
Pingback: Rokonq … sempre meglio. | Linarch Blog.